EnviroTech News

Stay up-to-date on the Environmental Industry News. You will also find resource links to industry articles and publications.

Latest News

The Consequences of Groundwater Sustainability in California
The Consequences of Groundwater Sustainability in California
Important Local Sacramento Groundwater Meeting on 2/13  "THE CONSEQUENCES OF GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY IN CALIFORNIA" EnviroTech is proud to be a scholastic co-sponsor at this months combined GRA/AEG meeting. As a scholastic supporter, EnviroTech has always tried to hire and use... Read More...
8 Recent Items Added to the Ca UST Fund
8 Recent Items Added to the Ca UST Fund
UST Fund News from CORE Environmental INFORMATION HEARD FROM THOSE WHO DEAL WITH THE FUND Eight Recent Items as to the California UST Fund No. 1 –  The Fund’s Payment Unit recently hired two payments analysts and a manager, and... Read More...
New Groundwater Sustainability Requirements - CA
New Groundwater Sustainability Requirements - CA
Tools for New Groundwater Sustainability Agency’s (GSA)In accordance with guidelines created under the Sustainability Groundwater Management Act each groundwater basin in the State will have an Agency (GSA) dedicated to to acquiring and reporting specific groundwater data and parameters for... Read More...
How Has 2016/2017 Winter Rainfall Impacted Groundwater?
How Has 2016/2017 Winter Rainfall Impacted Groundwater?
2017 began with one of the wettest starts on record. While we saw reservoirs filling up and rushing rivers in California earlier this year, groundwater levels reflected the differing hydrologic conditions of individual groundwater basins. Although water levels in shallow... Read More...

Industry Links

Low Flow Sampling in Ground Water:
An Overview on the Measurement of Water Quality Parameters to Determine Stability in Ground Water

In December 1995, the United States Environmental Protection Agency developed and published a document entitled “Low-Flow Ground-Water Sampling Procedures” (EPA/540/S-95/54). Since then, the use of low flow sampling in ground water has increasingly been used to support site assessment and remedial performance monitoring objectives.

The most common ground water purging and sampling methodology is to purge wells using bailers or high speed pumps to remove 3-5 casing volumes followed by sample collection. Adverse impacts can occur through this method affecting sample quality by increasing levels of turbidity. An overestimation of certain analytes – namely metals or hydrophobic organic compounds – may affect results with this method through the inclusion of otherwise immobile artifactual particles. Filtration of these turbid particles has proved undesirable in rectifying the turbidity problem and may, in fact, bias the results of contaminant concentration on the low side by potentially removing mobile (contaminant-associated) particles. These problems can often be mitigated by using low flow purging and sampling to reduce sampling-induced turbidity.

In order to minimize the hydraulic stress placed on an aquifer during purging and sampling, the technique of using low flow sampling is recommended. This is typically done through the use of an adjustable rate pump to remove water from the screened zone at a rate that will cause minimal drawdown of the water level in the well. Drawdown is measured in the well concurrent with pumping using a water level meter. Low flow sampling does not require a specific flow rate or purge volume. Low flow refers to the velocity with which water enters the pump intake and that is imparted to the formation pore water in the immediate vicinity of the well screen. Water level drawdown provides the best indication of the stress imparted by a given flow rate for any given hydrological situation. Typical flow rates on the order of 0.1-0.5 L/min are used, but this does depend on site-specific hydrogeology. Low flow sampling relies on the ability to collect samples after water level and measured field parameters stabilize over three consecutive readings taken three to five minutes apart.

Parameter Stabilization

It is recommended that water quality parameters be used to determine purging needs prior to sample collection in each well. Stabilization of parameters such as pH, specific conductance, dissolved oxygen (DO), oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), temperature, and turbidity should be used to determine when formation water is accessed during purging. In general, the order of stabilization is pH, temperature, and specific conductance, followed by ORP, DO, and turbidity. Performance criteria for determination of stabilization should be based on water-level drawdown, pumping rate, and equipment specifications for measuring these parameters. Instruments such as the YSI 556 multiparameter instrument can simultaneously measure parameters while utilizing a flow cell to give continuous data.

It should be noted that turbidity is a very conservative parameter in terms of stabilization. Turbidity is always the last parameter to stabilize and excessive purge times are invariably related to the establishment of too stringent turbidity stabilization criteria. It should also be noted that natural turbidity levels in ground water may exceed 10 nephelometric turbidity units (NTUs).

In-line water quality indicator parameters should be continuously monitored during purging. Water level drawdown should also be checked periodically as a guide to flow rate adjustment with the goal being minimal drawdown (<0.1 m) during purging. Measurements of water quality parameters should be taken every three to five minutes if the above suggested rates are used. Stabilization is achieved after all parameters being measured have stabilized for three successive readings. In lieu of measuring all five parameters, a minimum subset would include pH, conductivity, and DO (or turbidity).

Three successive readings should be within + 0.1 for pH, + 3% for conductivity, + 10 mv for ORP, and + 10% for DO or turbidity. These are guidelines provided for rough estimates. Many state agencies encourage the use of low flow sampling because it’s designed to collect a sample that most truly represents the water in the screened section of the aquifer surrounding the monitoring well. It does not come from water that is mixed within the well by a bailer or inertial sampler, nor does it come from an average of water that flowed the full length of a long screened interval.


The low flow sample can most often be trusted to best represent the contamination or lack thereof in the aquifer because it was produced by a process that minimizes stress on the aquifer or well. Low flow sampling also reduces the variability in sampling technique that is inherent in traditional bailing and purging procedures. In summary, low flow reduces the physical and chemical stresses, reduces the variability in sample procedures, increases the ability to determine well stabilization by continuously monitoring water quality parameters, and reduces the chance that changes in chemical concentrations are induced by the sampling technique.